User talk:Mccormick915

Editing Marymount College

The Marymount College, Palos Verdes expansion controversy section covers the expansion plans over the course of time and barely mentions the ballot initiative. It is properly sourced and NPOV. Your major revision to the article undertaken recently is completely without attribution or sources and is unverifiable, It reads line a promotional brochure. These changes do not conform to wiki policy. Please discuss changes to the article on it's talk page before making such extensive revisions to this article. I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 15:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted all your recent changes to the article. I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 15:18, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have begun to source and I am providing information that is factual, including the overview of the college and its history. This is accurate information about the college, which is the main purpose of the Marymount College wiki page. Mccormick915 (talk) 18:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You should post below previous entries. I hope you don't mind me editing YOUR talk page.

Reversion justification - I am sorry but the purpose of wikipedia is not factual accuracy or truth it is WP:VERIFIABILITY. Along with verifiability comes reliable sources see WP:RELIABLE and WP:NPOV. I understand what you are trying to do but citing a primary source (Marymounts own web site) and citing wikipedia as a source are both in conflict with wikipedia guidelines. I will work with you on improving the article if you like. I am not opposed to making the article more encyclopedic. That is the purpose of wikipedia. I am also not an opponent of the expansion plans. If you find fault with the things included in this article find more reliable sources that explain the situation better. But read the reliable sources guidelines first. I'm sorry but I must revert your additions as they do not follow wikipedia guidelines and you have deleted content that does follow the guidelines. Work with me on this. I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 01:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Marymount College, Palos Verdes. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]