User talk:MegaMerv

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 11:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MegaMerv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Bonjour, l'ensemble de mes contributions a fait l'objet d'un respect total des règles de contribution de la communauté depuis mes premiers pas sur le réseau il y a maintenant bientôt 10 ans. J'ai toujours consciencieusement intégré les retours des membres experts pour apporter des ajouts ou modifications neutres et systématiquement sourcés. J'ai également mis à jour mon profil, suite à la publication des comptes d'agence rémunérées afin de clarifier mes ajouts pour la page RCI Banque que j'ai pu faire effectivement de manière rémunérée mais en tant qu'indépendante. Je précise en effet que je n'appartiens à aucune agence de communication. J'espère donc vraiment pouvoir réintégrer la communauté. Bonne journée !

Hello, all of my contributions have been fully respected by the community’s contribution rules since my first steps on the network nearly 10 years ago. I have always conscientiously integrated the feedback of expert members to make neutral and systematically sourced additions or modifications. I also updated my profile, following the publication of the paid agency accounts in order to clarify my additions for the RCI Bank page that I was able to do effectively in a remunerated but independent way. Indeed, I do not belong to any communication agency. So I really hope to be able to reintegrate the community. See you soon! 2A01:CB00:B45:1E00:156E:84D2:B423:9146 (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well it appears you have forgotten that you are on the English Wikipedia, not the French Wikipedia. Communication needs to be in English. Regardless, a Google translate of your request has sufficed. Even if you do not belong to a communication agency, your account seems to exist for the sole purpose of maintaining the RCI Banque article. Thus I see no reason to unblock you. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you CaptainEek I was working on the english translation when you sent me this message few minutes after my answer in French. I am really sorry to read about that decision, it's not very fair because I contributed for 4 different articles since I created my account, not only RCI Banque. I didn't contribute for money for those other articles and I don't work for any communication agency. How can I prove my integrity? It's a shame because I really always play by Wikipedia rules as you can see it in my historical. 08:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)2A01:CB00:B45:1E00:156E:84D2:B423:9146 (talk)