User talk:Megerler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi. I can see that you made some recent edits to sigmoid colon. It is always good to see new editors within the field of anatomy. There is however a point of possible improvement; the reference in the article. If you take a look at Template:Cite book you can see how to make a reference for a book (I guess that Megerle, Robert P. is a book. If it is not look here in stead; Wikipedia:Citing sources).

If you want to cite a book, you can use a simple version of the code from the template-pages I linked to, just change the paramaters and copy it in directly in the text (where you written 2 now):

<ref>{{cite book |last=Megerle |first=Robert P. |authorlink= |year=2013 |title=The book he wrote}}</ref>

Let me know if you have any trouble with it. If you have you are more that welcome to send me a link to the book, webpage or whatever and I can make the code and type it in. To reply to this message, just press edit and write below. Happy editing. JakobSteenberg (talk) 08:38, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I really want to do is add a section that is titled function after "Path". I've researched many articles and books but none explain the reason it is "S" shaped. It,s strictly my scholarly input and I do believe it to be absolutely correct, but I am the reference. So I'll delete myself as the reference unless you can help credit me as the source. Thanks for the help. It would be fun for me to be the reference!
I will let you know if I come across a reference... and I fixed so you no longer are one in the article. JakobSteenberg (talk) 09:26, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Insect wings[edit]

The changes on Latest revision as of 08:59, 27 September 2014 adds a reference to ref name="Megerler" but does not give that reference any information. The edit that put that change in was user Usertalk:Megerler. The change is in Insect wing#Aerodynamics section. That looks to me like it's original research. Why shouldn't it be reverted? SesquiZed (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 27 September[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]