User talk:Metroidpal45

FileSend reads like an advertisement, thus a candidate for speedy deletion. I suggest editing it to be an acceptible stub. -- Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 18:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... I thought this might happen... Well, I'll work on it right away.

Your edits to Wii Menu

Just so you know, we can't "trust you," see WP:OR and WP:RS. Find a reliable source for that info and you can put it in. Thanks! Gscshoyru 15:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that when I had my Wii over in my standard gaming area, which is far away from the computer where I'm typing this down, the Wi-Fi strength was okay, but sometimes didn't work well, sometimes loading slow, or never loading at all. Then when I moved it closer, I noticed that it worked like a charm. This is probably because the Wii doesn't have a very strong antenna, or whatever, and doesn't have range too far. I've also noticed that sometimes I'd even loose my connecton for several days at a time, because of it being so far away. Also, the average person would have it in it's normal place, instead of right next to your router, which explains wy it's so slow. Obviously, it was slow for them because they didn't know alot about the Wii and Wi-Fi connectivity...plz put it back on. It might help people who need help with their conenction.

Wikipedia is not a guide, so putting it there to help people is not what wikipedia is about. It may very well be true, and I'm willing to bet it is. But we can't really trust you, so to speak, please see WP:OR for why original research is not allowed on wikipedia. If you find a reliable source for this information, by all means, put it there and cite. But until then, it's policy not to put your own observations on article pages, ok? Gscshoyru 15:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Filesend.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Filesend.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:20, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bishop Noll Prep Academy

A tag has been placed on Bishop Noll Prep Academy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 17:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Digimon

At Wikiproject Digimon, we are about to undergo a large project and we wish to see how many people wish to help and contribute. If you wish to help please sign here. Trainra 06:48, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]