Jump to content

User talk:Mike-tango

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Mike-tango, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Arnzy (talk contribs) 09:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mike-tango 16:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)== Hello ==[reply]

Salut Mike, j'ai vu que tu contribuais aussi içi. Je pense qu'il est pas mal de faire parler de la Ligne Maginot aussi en anglais. On toucherai une population plus importante et qui dispose surtout de plus de moyens financier pour venir visiter les ouvrages. J'ai commencé vite fait, juste pour faire un essai à écrire un article sur la Casemate de Rountzenheim Nord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). J'ai également vu sur la page de discussion de l'article sur la ligne que beaucoup se pose des questions et on pourrait peut etre inviter des gens intéressés à prendre part à des visites d'ouvrage en notre compagnie. Qu'en penses tu? Martial BACQUET 13:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tout a fait d'accord ... J'ai eu egalement cette idee, mais ne l'ai pas creuse plus, essentiellement par faute de temps  ;-)
Here we go! On est parti pour alors. A deux, on sera pas de trop. Martial BACQUET 20:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
peut-etre vais je pouvoir l'un de mes graves problemes existentialistes ... Comment traduire "Ouvrage" (au sens Ligne Maginot of cours) en english ? J'ai vu que tu as traduit (pour l'Otterbiel) par "Work" qui est le terme que j'aurais egalement employe, si je n'avais un book d'Anthony Kemp en anglais ou les termes Ouvrage et cloche GFM (autre exemple) sont utilises tels quels. J'ai vu que la traduction du site de l'AALMAA fait de meme. Je proposerais donc de garder les noms francais (Ouvrage Molvange, Cloche GFM) quand le terme ne correspond pas vraiment en anglais (j'ai vu utiliser cloche, cuppola en anglais, mais jamais bell) mais par contre turret 135 ... En francais j'utilise les termes anglais pour tout ce qui concerne l'USAF par exemple, car toute la litterature francaise les utilise (ie 52nd Tactical Fighter Wing et non pas 52e Escadre de Chasse Tactique) ... Mike-tango 00:50, 21 January 2007 (UTC) Cet exemple pourrait servir d'exemple pour la terminologie exemple[reply]
En effet, cette question est un vrai problème, car j'ai constaté également que le terme d'ouvrage était utilisé en anglais, donc je pense comme toi qu'il est préférable de le conserver. Je n'ai pas encore créer d'article concernant un ouvrage en anglais à cause de çà justement. Pour la cloche GFM, c'est vrai aussi que "bell" c'est plutôt pour une cloche d'église, donc je vais regarder quel serait le terme le plus approprié.
Le site que tu cites en exemple me parait pas mal au niveau référence pour l'utilisation des termes, mais il comporte cependant une erreur sur le plan situé tout en haut. C'est le mot "block" qui était utilisé par les américains sur la Ligne Maginot. Je regarde çà dans quelques minutes, et je te tiens au courant. Martial BACQUET 10:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Le problème du mot cupola, c'est qu'en français, çà signifie coupole. Et même si on trouve ce terme par exemple sur la carte IGN à l'emplacement du Schoenenbourg, je n'aime pas trop ce terme de coupole. Mais je suis ouvert à toute proposition. Si tu as une idée... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Martial75 (talkcontribs) 10:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Cloche GFM and something else[edit]

I created Cloche GFM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) then erased GFM bell. It's more easy to remember and to use these words. About works, I've initialized the Ouvrage Schoenenbourg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). It's the most used term, so if you agree with me, we have to use it for any "ouvrage". About casemates, we don't have a problem cause the word is the same in english than in french. About blockhaus, I think it's the same word too, but I've to check to be sure. Now, about turret, we have to harmonize our terms to be the same in every articles about the line. We have to do it also on the french wiki. lol

About the armaments, what do you suggest? Either we call a "FM" for "Fusil-Mitrailleur" as "MG" for Machine-gun or we call it just FM Fusil Mitrailleur like in french?

I'm waiting for your answer about that first of all. Thank you. Martial BACQUET 01:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ligne Maginot[edit]

Salut Mike, comment vas tu depuis le temps.

Je me rappele plus quand est-ce que tu reviens en France? Cà te tente toujours qu'on aille sur la Ligne Maginot?

A bientôt Martial BACQUET 22:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Martial

Je suis rentrė en France depuis un peu plus d'une semaine et suis a la recherche d' un logement moins provisoire que le petit studio dans lequle je suis en ce moment. Je te fais signe des que je suis livre pour aller sur la Ligne

A +

Mike-tango 20:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Mike-tango. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mike-tango. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]