User talk:M347758

Flying Spaghetti Monster fork

Hi Mike, if you wanted to move the page, there's actually a move button to do it. You copy and pasted the page onto a new article, which lead me to misunderstand. I'm not sure the founder is the correct title here; most people searching would use the term Flying Spaghetti Monster, not Bobby Henderson (intelligent design), and article titles tend to go with what people tend to search for. Either way, the fork is unnecessary with redirects, so I've taken the liberty of choosing one of the articles to redirect to the other; in this case I'll redirect Bobby Henderson to the FSM page. Please feel free to comment if you think this is wrong. ColourBurst 18:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

By the way, fork you! Sorry, could not resist. MikeURL 18:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

the BLP solution

sorry it took me a while, but I got 'round to answering your question Alf^Photoman 02:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Credentials debate

As per your request, I've clarified my comments at User talk:MikeURL/Credentials. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 20:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I saw your reply and have added some more of my thoughts. Walton ^{Vivat Regina!} 20:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Page you started

Is now at Wikipedia:Credential verification. Mak (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Unilateral

No, not really. You don't decide that a proposal will never reach consensus, you observe that it won't, based, in general, upon a host of objections on the talk page. It usually becomes clear rather quickly whether the community likes or does not like something (of course, rewording helps, but often there's a fundamental problem with a proposal, such as several of those in CAT:REJ). >Radiant< 15:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)