User talk:Millennium Sentinel

The current date and time is 24 June 2024 T 06:06 UTC.

Welcome[edit]

I note that nobody has welcomed you to Wikipedia so far - so welcome! Here's the standard "welcome" message - obviously you already know some of this stuff, since you signed your comment on my talk page:

Welcome!

Hello, Millennium Sentinel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Square News[edit]

TBH, the whole phrase is wrong. "secret" and "esoteric" and "occult" all refer to different things. "Esoteric" is correct, but "secret" is not entirely accurate - Masonry is open to anyone who asks (as long as they meet the requirements), and the ritual has been published numerous times. "Occult" is misleading, as historically speaking (IIRC), Aleister Crowley coined the term. I think the intro as it stands is the best we're going to get without having to add all sorts of qualifiers. MSJapan 19:56, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

{{WM|}}[edit]

Hi, I noticed you made edits to my wikistress meter, you can have your own one by using the template for it. I am being bold and adding it to your userpage, if you dont like it feel free to remove it :) --Cool Cat^Talk|@ 12:48, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to cry[edit]

Jeez, you sound on the RFV page like you're about to cry. I didn't sign your name anyway, idiot. I said per, which means I was agreeing with your statements. Also, I didn't call you a sock puppet, but those other users, which you seem to be admitting on my talk page are you. Also, don't edit my comments, because that is a blockable offense.
Primetime 22:23, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jahbulon,[edit]

You expressed interest in the word, Jahbulon, going away. stick yer vote here, brother:

To vote on the deletion of this article, follow this big ol' link to the AfD page & vote there.

& Delete this, my entry, at will. Grye 23:12, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Fake titles of nobility[edit]

Keep in mind that although discussion reached a concensus to have the content on Fake titles of nobility redirect to Prescriptive Barony, others are not so satisfied, as can be observed here. I've since reverted to the last version with content, as it is a safe thing to do, and I did not read the discussion. I advise keeping the page(s) on your watchlist, lest they be blanked or reverted again. Kareeser|^Talk! 05:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]