User talk:Ministry of Truth
No one's welcomed you yet, so:
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Ministry of Truth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Emmett5 18:31, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I would tend to disagree that the article is unnecessary; while GRC is a small company, it is a bit larger than Gibson himself, and somewhat distinct. Also note that the Donald Trump article is much larger than the Trump Organization article; this is just another case where the personality overshadows the enterprise.
I'm not intimately familiar with the company so I have little else to contribute myself, but I feel that the article has some use and can be expanded in the future. --AlexWCovington (talk) 17:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
See also
[edit]From Wikipedia:Guide to layout:
- Useful links that are not mentioned in the prose paragraphs can be added to the "see also" section.
Hope that helps. AlistairMcMillan 18:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
- Also from Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links):
- An article may be considered overlinked if any of the following is true: ...snip... a link is repeated in the same article ...snip...
Uh, did You Create all those kewl userboxes? (Estoniankaiju (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2009 (UTC))
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peg DHCP is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peg DHCP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Graywalls (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)