User talk:Mista Malone the Third

May 2021[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sega Genesis, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 00:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already gave a valid reason and I will change your revert Mista Malone the Third (talk) 23:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Please stop changing things on the wiki without a source. For instance, you made the SNES and SNES CD specs incorrect by just changing them with no source. And it also appears that you've been deleting or changing content from a whole bunch of pages like the Sega Genesis page. PiersyPiersy (talk) 16:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No the SNES and SNES CD specs are factually correct and My changes on the Sega Genesis page are to stay on there because they are accurate. Mista Malone the Third (talk) 23:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not enough. You need to provide reliable sources to verify your edits. If you don't provide sources, your edits are not to stay. If you don't start using sources, you'll continue to be blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 23:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It IS enough and my edits ARE to stay. You cannot hide the truth. You are not to remove any of my edits and you have no right to do so. I don’t have to provide anything, the SNES is 16 bit, The SNES CD is more powerful and that is a fact. Deal with it.

Policy makes it very clear. I have every right, and will block you myself if you add unsourced content to articles. Don't do it, or you'll be blocked. It's that simple. Sergecross73 msg me 23:43, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No you have NO right to change and if you keep blocking me I will report you Mista Malone the Third (talk) 23:51, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure you understand your rights here. Feel free to report me for enforcing one of our most basic, straight-forward rules. Sergecross73 msg me 00:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They aren’t straight forward rules and your enforcement isn’t justified. You are a bad moderator and you have no right to remove the truth Mista Malone the Third (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 23:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]