User talk:Mitch60

Please come to the Talk:David Vitter#D.C. Madam controvesry in lede where I had started a discussion when I reverted your earlier deletion from the article. Thanks. ∴ Therefore | talk 00:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting the controversy from the lede

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on David Vitter. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. I've requested that you come to the talk page to discuss why you feel that the rule from Wikipedia:Lede that states:

The lead should be capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article, establishing context, summarizing the most important points, explaining why the subject is interesting or notable, and briefly describing its notable controversies, if there are any. [emphasis mine]

isn't applicable in this instance. I would appreciate if you would cease deleting the material a fifth time. Thanks. ∴ Therefore | talk 04:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although you may not have technically violated the three-revert rule, you are nonetheless edit warring, and if you continue, you will be blocked. Please discuss your changes on the article's talk page, and pursue dispute resolution if necessary. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And after this warning, you nonetheless reverted to your version. You have been blocked for 24 hours. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to David Vitter, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Shoessss | Chat 13:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]