User talk:Mkstsr

Your edit to Nebuta Museum Wa Rasse

Hey Mkstsr, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia like you did at Nebuta Museum Wa Rasse; however, the edit you made to that page was removed since it failed to meet Wikipedia's standards for referencing. I'd recommend taking a look at Wikipedia:FAQ/Editing and the project's guide to referencing before contributing further. Also, if you have any other questions - just feel free to drop a message at my talk page. Cheers and happy editing! ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 03:13, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will again advise you to read through the policies I linked here. Also, your continued addition of the unverified content is coming close to edit warring. Please find a reliable source for the information you are trying to add - it's probably out there somewhere - and add it to the body of the article, not the lead, as who designed the museum is not really notable enough for that section. I'm urging you to communicate me and other editors here, Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. Otherwise, if you continue editing in the same manner you risk being blocked or even banned from editing. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 13:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm new to editing wikipedia, so I even had to look up how to make a reply to you. I guess, point no.1, the source I cited was from a blogpost from one of the architects, therefore, it is not reliable enough. Point no.2, If I were to add information about the architects that contributed to the projects, I should add it to the body of the article. As for point no.1, I was having trouble finding other online sources because it was 10 years ago, not many architectural publications had online contents back then. Will this do? https://shop.ga-tbc.co.jp/view/item/003005000111 As for point no.2, I will add the new information in the body if I could find an acceptable source. Mkstsr

No worries. You can cite offline content just as well as online content, I even referenced a plaque on a building at one point. All that matters is that it meets Wikipedia's standards for referencing. For what you mentioned, you would use this template for the source you mentioned. It seems to check out. If you add it to the article's "history" section, that would probably work out the best for now. If you have any questions about editing in general, I would be happy to help you here or over at my talk page. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano ☕️ 15:47, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It might take a while for me to figure out how to use the template, but I'll try and add a paragraph in the "history" section later on! --Mkstsr (talk) 07:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]