User talk:Mnbf9rca

Note: I will reply to all conversations on this page, unless you ask otherwise!

Welcome

Hello, Mnbf9rca, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 17:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Default first check number for other countries?

If you don't mind my asking, what country are you from? What is the default number for the first check in a checking account in your country? PrimeFan 20:59, 9 May 2006 (UTC) P.S. Please write your user page at your earliest convenience.[reply]

Hi PrimeFan. I'm from the UK. Here my chequebook starts 100001 (I forget how many zeros there are). If you have a second book on the same account (for example, you have a joint account), it is numbered 200001 and so on. Mnbf9rca 16:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC) p.s. I've made a concious decision not to create a user page, as I didn't think most people would be interested in anything I would have to say there, but perhaps you're right!

Ah, very interesting. Perhaps it's always a number of the form 10^n + 1 for single accounts anywhere on the world. I can't remember the check numbers from long ago when my wife and I had a joint account. In any case, here the banks are really trying to get everyone to use "online bill pay" rather than checks, but I'm old-fashioned like that. PrimeFan 20:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC) P.S. It's still good to have a user page even if it just has a couple of lines, in part it's for the benefit of recent changes patrollers. PrimeFan 20:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article NATO helmet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:NATO helmet. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Shazbot85^Talk 05:13, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]