User talk:Mrrevolt10

Delete Tag

Sorry for deleting the tags again. I tried deleting the biography table. Please add the tag again. Thanks.

Reverting your edits a third time would violate 3RR, so I will leave it up to an administrator to take care of. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 08:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Importance of Damon Min

Min is an important figure in entrepreneurship because of his success at a young age. Teen entrepreneurs such as Sean Belnick and Damon Min may be opening up a new generation of business-oriented teenagers. He is an emerging entrepreneur who exemplifies a success business story as he started off with just a $100 loan. Please allow this article to remain on Wikipedia as this is a notable person to business. Thank you.

-mrrevolt10

In this case, you might want to find some credible secondary sources to prove that this teenager is a notable person. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 08:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Damon Min

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Damon Min requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 08:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Damon Min, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 08:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Damon Min. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Kittensandrainbows (talk) 08:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Damon Min. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Glenfarclas (talk) 08:58, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hrs for repeated removal of speedy deletion tags after acknowledging that you may not remove them. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

.

February 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing repeated addition of non-notable individual to several articles. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned multiple times, blocked once already, and you continue to add in a non-notable individual so I have blocked you again. I strongly suggest that you go read the notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. If you return after the block has expired and resume your same editing pattern, you may find that the next block is indefinite. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:56, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then I will create a new account and keep going. You are a crazy fool. Get a life other than snooping around wikipedia.