User talk:Mujaki~enwiki

Welcome from Journalist

Welcome!

Hello, Mujaki~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Journalist (talk · contribs)

Re: Otome wa Boku ni Koishiteru second season

Hello, I was wondering (since you seem to know Japanese), can you tell me what it said in that website you posted in the edit summary when you took the second season info off the article? I tried to translate it myself, but didn't get very far...So what is the news on the second season? Is it just a rumor?--十八 01:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moenchu says that "The Otoboku fair ~Second Season~ started since Feb. 27. (2月27日より開催おとボクフェア ~セカンドシーズン~)". The telephone card on which Mizuho is printed is the loss leader of this sales. StarChild introduces this website.

Incidentally, getchu deleted the description connected with new anime series on its website, even though the (wrong?) information was posted on Feb. 28....--Mujaki 03:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Otome wa Boku ni Koishiteru official spellings

I'm not sure you're aware, but Wikipedia has a convention to use revised Hepburn romanization which convert oo, uu, and ou sounds into ō, ū, and ō respectively. I bring this up since there were a bunch of examples where you changed it from the revised Hepburn ō to ou in several names. Also, where are you getting these official spellings? Like where is it written that Shion is meant to be romanized as Sion?--十八 18:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Miyanokouji", "Sion Jujo", "Suoin" and "Seio" are based on Caramel Box Yarukibako developed by Caramel Box. Incidentally, they are correct spelling in Romanization of Japanese. Of course, "Miyanokōji", "Shion Jūjō", "Suōin" and "Seiō" are proper too. And I didn't change romanizations for pronunciations of Japanese.--Mujaki 19:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Their spellings are "Miyanokouji", "Sion Jujo" and "Suouin" in the manual of the PS2 version developed by Alchemist.--Mujaki 21:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"ou" is not necessarily long vowel in Japanese. The reading of "とまどう" is "To/ma/do/u". The pronunciation of "こうじ(小路)" is "Ko/u/ji", "Ko/o/ji" or "Kō/ji".--Mujaki 20:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WT:MOS-JA

I am tired of hearing the same quotes of WP:OR and WP:RS from you when it comes to my explanations on the proposal to change the romaji spelling thing, so let me make this clear to you. On Wikipedia we have a policy that very blatantly says

If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it.

This is how I am treating your constant quotes that secondary sources are preferred, as are English language ones, and whatever else you are discovering as the discussion goes on. These are obviously getting in the way of improving the encyclopedia when it comes to naming articles on Japanese topics. Therefore, it is better to ignore them rather than follow them to the letter. I understand that you are not as used to the practices of the English Wikipedia and you do not have an adequate grasp of English, but if we follow every rule to the letter, it does not help us write these pages.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:25, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wi & We

There is discussion at WT:MOS-JA concerning the inclusion of the w for ゐ/ヰ and ゑ/ヱ. In addition, all of the content I added (two W's and ウー) is verifiable. All of the information I have stated on that page is already sourced elsewhere on the project.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 07:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adding that many fact tags to Hepburn romanization is a bit disruptive. Requesting references for the fact that there are three variants when there are only three listed is superfluous, saying that something was left in the third edition but still requesting a reference is pointless, the long e to ei thing is unnecessary, at the discussion I linked to above and that you very clearly responded to earlier there does not need to be a reference to say that ゐ/ヰ is wi and ゑ/ヱ is we, and I have personally seen ウー used as an approximation for the "wu" sound where ウーマン is the approximation for the word "woman" (you can see this at List of Cowboy Bebop episodes where "ウーマン" should probably never be ūman in Hebonshiki). Over the course of several months you inappropriately changed Hepburn romanization, filling it with references where they are overly unnecessary and now requesting references where it is common sense and can be taken for granted.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 08:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Hepburn romanization

{{Citation needed}} tags are not used for raising issues you have about semantics (whether or not "modified Hepburn" is sometimes called "revised Hepburn") or pointing out inconsistencies.

Also, there was no reason for you to remove the examples of "woman" and "wood" for wu. Nor was there any reason for you to remove the ヲゥ and ゔ entries.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:58, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write so much when responding. It makes it difficult to discern what your problems are and it makes it even more difficult to come to a consensus.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:36, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing the "woman", "wood", ゔ, and ヲゥ mentions.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 18:29, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Softpal

The article Softpal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:55, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Mujaki. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Mujaki~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

16:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Caramel Box Yarukibako

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Caramel Box Yarukibako, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:27, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]