User talk:Mvcg66b3r/Archives/2021/January

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume ownership of articles, as you did at WRNN-TV, you may be blocked from editing. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy.Your persistent reverting of good faith edits of TV pages without discussion appears to be a violation of WP:OWNERSHIP. Please stop. BlueboyLINY (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

@BlueboyLINY: You do the exact same thing (assume ownership of articles). And my edits are in good faith. I think it's best that we lock the article for some time while we sort things out. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 14:48, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at WRNN-TV shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

ANI

An ANI discussion has been opened regarding you and another editor. This message is to notify you of that discussion. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:49 on January 14, 2021 (UTC)

I do suggest you come to that ANI discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Ownership_problem_at_articles_about_TV_stations and contribute your own viewpoint on the issues being discussed there. -- MelanieN (talk) 16:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Grammatical issue with WVPX-TV

I wouldn't have an issue with a comma after the owner in the opening sentence for a TV station article if the owner was "Inyo Broadcast Holdings, Inc." or "Inyo Broadcast Holdings, LLC", but "The station is owned by Inyo Broadcast Holdings, as part of a duopoly with Canton-licensed Ion Plus affiliate WDLI-TV (channel 17)." is grammatically incorrect. That's why I've been trying to rewrite it, the comma is unnecessary, or the sentence needs to be rewritten in order for it to make sense. Nathan Obral (talk) 02:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

You're going to have to explain better

You made a claim that {{TV Fool}} was an "outdated template", yet the template is still present and the template still works. Was there a TfD discussion? If not, please restore the template now. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Walter Görlitz, I've restored it, thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello

I see from you edit history you have had you account since 02:42, 13 August 2015. Perhaps you should have had a look at my edit history before leaving a template message such as you did on my talk page. Also I suspect that you are an American, please read Wikipedia:systemic bias. -- PBS (talk) 11:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)