User talk:Mvcg66b3r/Archives/2023/May
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mvcg66b3r. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2023 subchannel section
This section at 2023 in American television I believe requires your attention. 100.7.44.80 (talk) 13:51, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging @Sammi Brie: Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
- Did the ping work? 100.7.44.80 (talk) 13:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Ohio stations
Not trying to have a brawl with you, but just because an out of state station can be seen in bits of Ohio, it doesn't make them Ohio stations.
It's like with radio. I live in Cleveland, I can get WJR 760 in Detroit loud and clear on my radio at home, but it doesn't make WJR a Cleveland station.
Same deal with TV...some folks in Ohio can get an out of state station, great - nice little bonus.
Still doesn't make them Ohio stations Vjmlhds (talk) 17:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- A station does not have to be licensed in Ohio to serve parts of the state, hence the "Licensed to and serving" part of the title. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Just because a station can squeak into a sliver of Ohio, it doesn't mean it necessarily serves that area. I go back to the WJR example earlier. Vjmlhds (talk) 17:36, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Charlotte
First things first, I've seen that you took my idea for state network markets and ran with it.
Cool.
Now regarding Charlotte, there was a method to my madness - that whole area of Greater Charlotte is referred to as "Metrolina", so I included that name to show that these stations cover that whole area. Vjmlhds (talk) 18:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Edit summaries (2)
In a message above I mentioned a misleading edit summary. I notice that in fact you almost always give either no edit summary or just an automatically generated one. That is obviously not as bad as giving misleading edit summaries, but it still isn't helpful. Without edit summaries any editor wishing to get an indication of what editing has been done on a page has to either laboriously check every edit or else go without, so please do always give an edit summary briefly indicating what your edit is doing. JBW (talk) 20:21, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
May 2023
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:30, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
KUOC-LD
According to RabbitEars.info, some network are no longer on the subchannel and article needs to updated from what I've heard. OWaunTon (talk) 23:51, 30 May 2023 (UTC)