User talk:NatalieDreyfuss87
May 2023
[edit]
Hello, I'm Maria Gemmi. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Natalie Dreyfuss seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Maria Gemmi (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- I wrote this information according to the Natalie Dreyfuss's IMDB page.
- (Reference: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0237849/) NatalieDreyfuss87 (talk) 15:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
- IMDB is not a reliable source for Wikipedia articles. Also, are you the subject of this article based on your username? If so, please refer to conflict of interest guideline. If not, the username may be misleading by implying that you are her. LizardJr8 (talk)
Try placing Citations on your statements
[edit]Add reference reports, news on additions made on the article BrightsForever (talk) 07:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Phoebe Snow00 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Diana Agron00. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Courcelles (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.