Hello Netministrator, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
- CobaltBlueTony 20:38, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(canned message; your best be for questions is the link, not me ;-) .)
You cannot remove the material from the "Pay Attention" book until you prove the it cannot be used. Please review the legal resources referenced by those adding it, in the talk section of the main page. Thanks! - CobaltBlueTony 19:15, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with your comments, but you have to prove that to the Wikipedia people, as DF'ed and disgruntled JW Wikipedians are apparently making it public, and not just on Wikipedia. If you have suggestions, by all means share them. I really would like to get that info off this resource. If you have the time, you may wish to contact the Legal Department of the WT Society. I emailed Wikipedia just now. Read my letter here.- CobaltBlueTony 16:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Editing Jehovah's Witnesses articles: Because of the volatile and tenacious nature of certain editors whose stated or subliminal goal is to detract from Jehovah's Witnesses at any and every opportunity, I am making it my goal to recommend to new and existing editors interested in JW articles to review the Wikipedia's policies:
We do have to keep in mind that Wikipedia is not the proper forum for any form of proselytizing. This is an academic endeavor, and to make it worthwhile for Jehovah's Witnesses to contribute positively, abiding by the rules of the forum and sticking to the facts will help us not only keep these articles and the discussions behind them free from ineffective and off-topic banter, but present a respectable product that addresses all sides, but keeps them in perspective. It is best to ignore insults and off-topic discussions, addressing only the pertinent points so as to reach a consensus regarding the content of these pages. If you must address them, it's best to simply cite the Wikipedia standards and redirect your focus to content and format. I hope my suggestions help. Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony 21:26, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a likely sockpuppet of Retcon (see the checkuser results). If you would like to contest this block, please contact me or place {{unblock}} on your page. // Pathoschild 16:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
