User talk:Nikicia/sandbox

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review	5/9/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Nikicia
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length.
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	Good grammar.
Other comments	Stress is a great topic, see if you can add some bullets, good job!

Joselv83 (talk) 04:09, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: DJames5

Date of review- 5/6/13

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page** Nikicia

URL of editor’s Userpage- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/6/13

Date review submitted to instructor- 5/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)- Good

Image (needed/appropriate)- n/a

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)- Accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)- Yes

Wikiformatting- could have added bullet points or numbers for more points

Grammar & composition- Good

Other comments- none

DJames5 (talk) 16:48, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Date of review 05/06/2013

Name of editor: Nikicia URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013

Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length of edit

Image (needed/appropriate) None applicable for this edit

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided directly from text the text book

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided

Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting

Grammar & composition Grammar and spelling were error free

Other comments Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 23:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Ramnel Cortorreal User:CRamel16 Date of review 05/06/2013

Name of editor: Nikicia URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013

Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short) Meets Length Requirement

Image (needed/appropriate) Not necessary for the edit

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided

Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting

Grammar & composition No Grammatical errors found

Other comments Good edit. CRamel16 (talk) 23:29, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer- F.Moshammad

Date of review 5/10/2013

Name of editor-Nikicia.

URL of editor’s Userpage - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/10/13

Date review submitted to instructor 5/10/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)-Not too long or too short

Image (needed/appropriate)- Image is not needed but an image can improve the quality of the edit.

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)-The information is accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed- N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)- N/A

Wikiformatting- The formatting looks good.

Grammar & composition- Proper construction of edit

Other comments - Good Job!

F.Moshammad (talk) 04:36, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date of review	5/10/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Nikicia
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nikicia
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/10/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/10/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good! Try to add bullets, such as relaxation, biofeedback, and cognitive restructuring, can be put into bullet formatting
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	needs better Formatting.
Grammar & composition	Good grammar.
Other comments	Stress is a great topic, good job! However, are you just using the textbook as a reference for this edit? I saw another book below! Keep in mind that the class textbook is the only book we using as a reference to do textbook base edits! (this pre peer review is for Stress Management)

VIMMYSEAJATAN 142.105.19.140 (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Vimmy (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]