User talk:Nivix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Note: I usually reply here unless you tell me otherwise.


Will you please revert Vince Vaughn? I couldn't do rvv because of my security reason. Thank you. Oda Mari 17:35, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I saw the rv on recent change page. Oda Mari 17:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
No problem. Nivix talk 17:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

President of the United States[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your revision of the vandalism; unfortunately, there was vandalism by another user earlier, and when you reverted, you kept the earlier vandalism. It's a good idea when reverting to check to make sure there aren't any other vandalism edits to revert. One way to tell (sometimes) is if a number of edits were made in a row to an article by IP addresses that do not include descriptions of the edits. Thanks again. Info999 21:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I'll be more thorough in the future. Thanks for notifying me. Nivix talk 21:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Revert Please?[edit]

Will you please revert Artificial intelligence. I've already used up my three for the day. --Amaraiel 14:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Nevermind. Already done. --Amaraiel 14:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
The three-revert rule is only restricting you from making more than three reverts on a single article. I don't see that you have done any reverts in the past 24 hours on that article, so I would say that you are safe to proceed if the vandal returns. Nivix talk 14:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
    • I must have misunderstood it then. Thanks! --Amaraiel 14:59, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

The comments you deleted are true. both the comment about Robin Quivers and Artie Lang can be substantiated by a February 2006 broadcast of The Howard Stern show. I resent your accusation of vandalism. Here's another verifiable Fact.... You Suck! You Wikipedia Nazi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 18:38, September 6, 2007 (UTC)

Help, Pizza Grandiosa[edit]

I've now added a link from the online edition of the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet, that explains more about the doubt-issue.

And I've removed any references to message-boards what so ever.

So there should now be six references to reliable sources confirming the information in the section.

So it would be very fine if you had the oppertunity to have a look at this.

Because I can't see any thing in the section, which isn't properly documented.

So I hope you have the chance to have a look at this!

Thanks in advance!


I note that you have previously reverted edits to Grandiosa, citing original research, FUD etc. I too share your concerns about these edits, and like you have seen my attempts to remove them immediately overridden. I have started a thread in the article's talk page for discussion if you are interested. Ros0709 11:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:Hornbook -- a new law-related task force for the J.D. curriculum[edit]

Hi Nivix,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 02:09, 31 July 2009 (UTC)


The first number is the same, but the rest are NOT, Look at the edit history and compare. This IP is me, and I have NEVER edited that article, nor have I edited an article with intent to leave intentional vandalism. Get your facts straight before you accuse. Draconiator (talk) 06:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)