User talk:NoCarrier

Welcome!

Hello, NoCarrier, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - UtherSRG (talk) 00:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any electronic documentation to show that the external link on Female ejaculation has been approved? Lacking proof of this 'approval' I will continue to remove it from the page as it is added. Carl.bunderson 02:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining. I looked deep in the page history (about 6 months ago) and found what you're referring to. Sorry about the problem, I've just been fed up and therefore short with those who appear as spammers to me. It would be helpful if the discussion had been in the talk page rather than in the page history though...I would have found it much earlier. Sorry for the trouble. Carl.bunderson 04:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yahoo link on female ejaculation

External Links should only rarely be in a wikipedia article. The Wikipedia policy is at Wikipedia:External_links.

Unrelated information does not belong in the article at all.
Related information of value should be incorporated into the article itself, and citations in the reference section.
Rarely a link, such as one with a great deal of information (medical, technical, scientific) might be there because it is to detailed or technical for the article.
Sometimes external links are there temporarily, until they can be incorporated into the article.

Wikipedia is not a link repository.

Links to be avoided include: Links to search engine results.

The Yahoo link will be removed. Restoring it will be viewed as vandalism. If you continue to vandalize, your account will be blocked from editting. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to female ejaculation, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 day. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. UtherSRG (talk) 19:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 2 days. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 week. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. UtherSRG (talk) 10:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 month. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. UtherSRG (talk) 17:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoCarrier (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The link is not from a search engine. It's from a reviewed Yahoo! directory. The links were approved by editors. And the link I added was approved by this community. Including Carl Bunderson. UtherSRG is acting like a dictator and does not listen to anyone.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by NoCarrier (talk • contribs) .

Decline reason:

Based on your past blocks and attitude, I think a block is in order here.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoCarrier (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

UtherSRG thinks I am spamming but I am putting a link from the Yahoo! directory that was approved by the community months ago.

Decline reason:

Decline reason? Hmmm... this? Do not add another unblock request -- Glen 08:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Carl Bunderson wrote:

> Hello Pascal, > > I suggest that you get an RfA, or just inform an admin about the situation. If you need it, I'll back you up on it. > > Regards, > > Carl

You'll get a lot farther leaving those there for a start Glen 08:00, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated RfUs, comment faking etc.

Hello. Do not post any more requests for unblock. Do not forge others' comments on this talk page or remove previous RfUs. If you keep disrupting this page, you may be blocked from editing it or your block may be increased in length. This is your final warning. Sandstein 20:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment originally posted to user page

A recent edit of yours in the article Female ejaculation has a summary that does not accurately describe your changes. Please write edit summaries that tell other editors what you did. --LQ 20:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for persistent linkspamming of Female ejaculation

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of one year because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. — Sandstein 20:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]