User talk:NoMagicHarry

Welcome!

Hello, NoMagicHarry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All India Trade Union Centre

Please do not simply strike out articles you don't think are fitting content for Wikipedia. Your options are to either merge it with another article (mostly if it is a duplicate article a subtopic of another article), or to propose its deletion. Thank you, VanTucky 20:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoMagicHarry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked again unnecessarily. I did not vandalise any pages or did not hide myself. I declared that I User: Sekharlk. Wiki policy do allow to create a new account by keeping up with wiki editing policies. As was suggested by editors, this time I created an account for myself and requested by friend to use another computer. It is also unfair to block the IP of an academic institution for no reason. I clearly stated that some was sharing my computer for a long time and not any more. The list of evidences shown by the admin who blocked me does not show any instance of vandalism or abuse. I have clearly discussed with editors like User: Soman in making the necessary edits. So please unblock this account.

Decline reason:

Wikipedia's policy does not allow you to create a new account to evade a block on an existing account. If you wish to have your original account unblocked, you can post an unblock request on that account's talk page. You may not create another account to circumvent the block that is in place. Gwernol

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 1

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NoMagicHarry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Gwernol please check my User page User: Sekharlk I have had requested unblockes there and then an admin did not like it. So he held it off without allowing me even to request for unblocking. I request you to verify the edits made in the pages that Yalma claims as that I vandalised or abused my accounts. They were not any vandalism in any way. And so also I was asked to create presonal accounts by User: Soman and others based on which I decided to create a new page though not hidding my original identity. My edits in the pages cited as evidence are truly adhering to Wikinorms.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.