User talk:NodnarbLlad

Welcome!

Hello, NodnarbLlad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! GofG _|^|_| Contribs 20:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Counter

http://tools.wikimedia.de/~interiot/cgi-bin/Tool1/wannabe_kate There ya go! GofG _|^|_| Contribs 20:49, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sign your comments

Please, from now on, after a comment, sign your signature by typing ~~~~ (four tildes) or pressing the Signature button that looks like a bit of cursive writing. By the way, if you need more help getting it to work, leave a message on Lupin's talk page; he's the one who made it. User talk:Lupin. GofG _|^|_| Contribs 23:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Space Pilot 3000

Could you please explain why you reverted the edits I made (here? I felt they were constructive edits which removed the trivia from that article which is currently overrun with it. Most of the removals were due to original research and unverifiable claims so I don't see what the problem was. A lot more could stand to be removed really, I was holding back. Stardust8212 20:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turk Murphy

Could you please explain why you reverted the edits I made on 26 Feb 2007 at Turk Murphy? PRRfan 20:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Watch for double reverts

Hey, great job with the vandal fighting! Just a word of caution - I see a few instances where you're accidentally reverting yourself and thereby reinstating vandalism. Here, here, and here just in the last few minutes. You may want to take a quick look through your contributions and find where else you've accidentally reverted yourself since that makes the vandalism harder to spot for everyone else. Thanks and keep up the good fight! :) —Wknight94 (talk) 20:58, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Job!

Hi there, just wanted to say job well done. You beat me to the punch with the Francis II of France reversion, so kudos! Good work. chamaeleon 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Lovdahl[reply]

Could you please explain why you reverted the edits to serpins I made - these were valid additions that were improving the science of the article. Accordingly I will report you as a vandeal. JCW

Be a bit more careful :)

Howdy Brandon! You're doing great antivandal work, but unfortunetly you seem to be making a mistake about once every 80 reverts or so. Remember to, if you aren't sure if it's a good edit or not, assume that it is, as if it isn't, someone who knows that it isn't will eventually come along and change it, but if it is, then it's gone unless someone is browsing the history. I'm also a bit confused as to why you warned yourself with a final warning... why exactly was this done? GofG _|^|_| Contribs 21:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]