User talk:Northamerica1000/Churnalism

This page was nominated for deletion on 2 August 2017. The result of the discussion was Userfy.

This is Northamerica1000/Churnalism's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Northamerica1000/Churnalism.
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Avoid personal attacks For disputes, seek dispute resolution
Archives: 1

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Squarespace was copied or moved into Wikipedia:CHURNALISM with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archives

1

Additional points?

I had an illuminating discussion today with Lemongirl1942 about churnalism and wonder if there is some content that could be added to the essay from this discussion. For instance, the scenarios in which churnalism can take place (e.g., not just press releases, types of sources more prone to churnalism), and an additional strategy for avoiding churnalism (e.g., choice of sources, types of articles).

If you think this is appropriate for the article, I would be happy to take a stab at drafting additional content.--CaroleHenson (talk) 07:16, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edited

This page was edited during the course of the recent MfD discussion to address concerns stated therein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Following the move, would you mind deleting the Wikipedia:CHURNALISM and Wikipedia:CHURN redirect pages? K.e.coffman (talk) 01:28, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer the shortcuts, as they are functional, and people are aware of them. Other user page essays also have such shortcuts atop and in them. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:14, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]