User talk:NotAmyFuller

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spotfixer for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Schrandit (talk) 05:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

As it turns out, I'm not User:AmyFuller, but it doesn't matter because you will never be free from those who notice your vandalism and revert it. I don't have to lift a finger -- and in fact, I won't -- but you will be hounded until you finally leave. It's only a matter of time. NotAmyFuller (talk) 12:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Let's not pretend that we are unacquainted. I'm not going to leave under anything less than my own volition and we have proven, ad nauseum, that I have not and am not violating any of Wikipedia's policies. I know you don't like me and I know its the begining of summer in a recessioin but you've got to have something more benificial you could be doing with your time. - Schrandit (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm quite acquainted with your pattern of vandalism. However, I happen not to be Amy Fuller, hence the name.

You have proven, time and time again, that pushing your neo-Nazi viewpoint only leads to edit wars. What amuses me is how comfortable Wikipedia is with harboring your sort of person. Frankly, it gets what it deserves, but noobs deserve to be warned. NotAmyFuller (talk) 13:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm going to call Godwin's law and cut you short right here. There are no edit wars, no permanent damage to the project, you can keep popping up every couple of weeks and the community will just slap you down your lame socking as it deserves to be. I'm not going anywhere. - Schrandit (talk) 13:15, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Schrandit is right, and you've been slapped down again. Blocked as a sock puppet. –MuZemike 20:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC)