User talk:Official.theboldandthebeautiful

November 2013

Hello, I just wanted to tell you that you're edits on Eric Forrester and Aly Forrester are vandilisim. You need to understand that Aly's Forrester page was stolen from another user's sandbox. That is NOT allowed on Wikipedia. Please do the work yourself and that the character absolutely fails per WP:NOTABILITY. Not enough sources to establish her notability in third-party context. You need to stop or you could easily reported and blocked. Therefore I suggest you stop right now. This is vandilism. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 10:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, we do not do specific occupation, meaning if someone has work in a buisness, you call them Buisnessman. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 11:01, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

″You are doing vandalism because we are the official for ©theboldandthebeautiful. So Please, don't delete or modification the pages, thank you.″ I do not beleive a word that you said, you can just a fan and claiming being the offical ©theboldandthebeautiful. I am doing what right for wikipedia and I am following the rules, you're not that vandalisim not deleting you're edits. I'm telling you one last time. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 11:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Eric Forrester

Your recent editing history at Eric Forrester shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. TigerShark (talk) 13:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for carrying on edit warring which I believe you began using account User:Facts.people. TigerShark (talk) 13:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]