User talk:PEpicka

This user is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet of Afrika paprika as established by the user's edits, and has been blocked indefinitely.

See contribs — page moves — all logs — block log

No personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. // Laughing Man 01:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't know what to think anymore. Afrika paprika, if this is one of your sock puppets, you're really getting too far this time. If not - please read WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Thank you. --PaxEquilibrium 16:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock!

This is ridiculous! I am NOT Afrika paprika. This time you can even do this "check user" of yours and you'll see that I'm not using the 194.! It's just so sad that this Orthododox Serbophil Koi-Koi cannot see that he has falen under GreaterSerbian influence. The Serbdom is winning again...

You must really think he's (as you probably already think about me) an idiot... --PaxEquilibrium 14:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PEpicka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I AM NOT AFRICA PAPRIKA

Decline reason:

Ah ha. -- Yamla 23:40, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PEpicka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

DO THE DAMNED CHECK USER!!!!!!

Decline reason:

Considering your edits, it's not needed. Your propensity to expose yourself is enough to confirm our suspicions. -- ²¹⁰physicq (c) 01:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.