User talk:Pakistanlabours

December 2017

Hello, I'm Donner60. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Pakistanis because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to National Testing Service. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism, disruptive editing or addition or removal of text contrary to Wikipedia guidelines or policy or addition or removal of text that contains or results in factual errors or addition of spam or advertising to Wikipedia articles. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Pakistan Army, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 04:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

As further information, please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Verifiability. Wikipedia is not a forum, blog, soapbox, fan site, advice site or vehicle for advertising or self-promotion. It is an encyclopedia based on reliable, verifiable, third-party sources. It does not publish rumors, personal opinions, commentary, advocacy, advertising, spam, original research or unsourced information likely to be changed, challenged or disputed. See also Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, Wikipedia:Five Pillars, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, Wikipedia:Citing sources, Help:Footnotes, Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. For further information about contributing to Wikipedia, see: Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners; Getting started; Introduction to Wikipedia; Wikipedia:Simplified ruleset; Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Wikipedia:Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 04:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism, disruptive editing or adding or removing text in violation of Wikipedia guidelines. The next time you vandalize or add advertising or spam to Wikipedia, as you did to Rozee.pk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Donner60 (talk) 04:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 12:22, 31 December 2017 (UTC)