User talk:Paleobiota

January 2024[edit]

Hello! I'm Donald Albury. Your recent edit(s) to the page Proarticulata appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The cited Maslov, et al. source says 567. You did not offer any source that says different. Donald Albury 20:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article on cephalozoa, a class in the phylum Proarticulata, dates to 571 mya. But the article on proarticulata says that they date back to 567???? Paleobiota (talk) 21:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a reliable source. We go by what reliable sources say. A source cited for the first paragraph of the article mentions 571. Find a reliable source that gives different dates and cite it. Donald Albury 01:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]