User talk:Parkerds

Edward Lunt

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Vegaswikian 00:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Walmsley

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles as it is considered vandalism. You may place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page if you oppose an article's speedy deletion. Thanks. Accurizer 12:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles. If you continue to remove them, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Accurizer 12:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

This user is a vandal see Maghull please block now.--84.9.194.64 12:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

William McGuiness

Please do not remove maintenance notices from articles unless the required changes have been made to the article. If you are uncertain whether the article requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the article's talk page before removing the notice from the article. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. Thank you. Accurizer 12:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cyril Kerley

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Accurizer 22:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting the Articles for deletion notice:

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, please join the discussion and consider improving the article so that it meets the Wikipedia inclusion criteria.

Your comment here hasn't helped you or anyone else. It could be interpreted as a personal attack, which is really not a good thing to do, and is likely to get you blocked. Your claims of a "right wing" agenda are quite frankly absurd.

I don't doubt the accuracy of the content of the Cyril Kerley article, although if you want people to believe it, you need to make sure that people can verify it. If you want the article to remain, you need to convince people that the subject is notable enough to be included in an encyclopaedia. We can't have articles about everybody. Please read the notability guidelines. If you still believe that he is notable enough, you need to give some more specific examples as to why, and these need to be verifiable.

There is also the Neutral Point of View policy on Wikipedia. Claiming that somebody is the "most notable person from (some place)" is your point of view, so doesn't follow this policy either. --RFBailey 13:11, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as it is considered vandalism. You may comment at the respective page if you oppose an article's deletion. Thanks. Pseudomonas 18:58, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stjepan Bobek

Please do not remove maintenance notices from articles unless the required changes have been made to the article. If you are uncertain whether the article requires further work, or if you disagree with the notice, please discuss these issues on the article's talk page before removing the notice from the article. These notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. Thank you. Accurizer 19:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dominc Sean Parker

Dominc Sean Parker has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this information might not be verifiable. Please review Wikipedia:Verifiability for the relevant policy. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so, citing sources.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 19:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]