User talk:PartySan CZ

partysan.net

Vocoder demo track

I did not wish to upset you, but Wikipedia is not MySpace for personal projects. 30 seconds is plenty for most audio clips on Wikipedia, and this track sounds like a teenager's quick demo rather than a professional quality recording. If I do not remove this then it is quite likely that someone else will.--Ianmacm 19:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there ;) I did this in maybe 15 minutes (excluding lyrics) just take a look at the file info -- and I think it perfectly does it's job although I used the cheapest micro on earth (the one build in my notebook).

it demonstrates how chords and melody affect the formant rather than a 1 second sample
it demonstrates how to vocode an instrument (drums) instead of a voice and the result.

Both practices are described in the article, but the one shot sample somehow lacked.

It's really nothing more than a technical demonstration rather than a "song", so why should I put my best melodies in a quick demo I release for free? I could probably supply demos for many synths which have articles here on Wikipedia. However if people expect me to release "professional quality recordings" for free I'm out ;)

By the way I usually just record vocals in "professional environments" and play guitar in private, so take into account I'm no keyboard wizz at all, just grabbed one which looked good for this demo ;=).--PartySan CZ 20:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I would rather have the vocoded section from ELOs Mister Blue Sky. This is a classic demo of a singing vocoder effect, and could be uploaded as long as the clip was 30 seconds or less. Can we consider this as a compromise?--Ianmacm 20:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:In my dreams sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:In my dreams sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 08:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laura peace 200.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Laura peace 200.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:53, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]