Jump to content

User talk:PatienceMackarness

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image of George Mackarness

[edit]

Patience, before you leap into the murky world of image uploads, can I help you get it clear how the image needs to be licence before some of those who are very hot on picking out mistakes jump on you and the image you upload.

That George died in 1883 should make things easier, but to help can you answer the following questions:

  1. Is there any indication who the photographer was? if so, who and do you know when they died?
  2. has the image been published anywhere else before you published it on [1]? If so, when?

I know this sounds like it's making what should be simple, complicated but unfortunately US & UK copyright laws both have to be obeyed and they are very different and have very different periods of copyright. leave your answers on this page and I'll see them. then I can advise you how to correctly licence the photo. Nthep (talk) 17:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I don't know the answers to any of these! The image - like almost all those on The Mackarness Place website - was in my father's family archive. It appears to be a good quality copy of a photo taken when George was Bishop of Argyll and the Isles. It has his name and dates written on the back, in my father or grandmother's handwriting, but there is nothing about the photographer.

Thanks,

PatiencePatienceMackarness (talk) 19:26, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Patience, not a problem. Time is not something to worry about on Wikipedia. So it looks like either a family shot or more likely, given it's age, a shot by an unknown professional photographer. That makes it fairly easy to licence. You can upload it to Wikipedia using both the following licences {{PD-UK-unknown}} and {{PD-US-unpublished}}, this establishes it's public domain status is both the UK and the US. If you have any problems uploading it, just leave a note here and I'll see it. Nthep (talk) 19:44, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, PatienceMackarness, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was George Mackarness, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Katieh5584 (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to understand where the conflict of interest lies? - is it to do with having Mackarness as a username? I certainly feel I can be neutral about a great-great uncle who died 130+ years ago, and have only added in some dates, one of his incumbencies and the fact that he was a second not a younger son!

Let me know if I need to submit these kinds of changes for approval in future.

PatienceMackarness (talk) 20:08, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Patience, ignore it, for the very reasons you've already stated. There's no indication that you can't be neutral. Nthep (talk) 20:28, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]