User talk:Pava
| Wikipedia:Babel | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
|
Questo utente si sente italiano 365 giorni l'anno, e non soltanto quando gioca la nazionale o si esibiscono le frecce tricolore. |
Ciao, :) scrivimi pure qui quello che desideri.
Hi, :) Talk me here please.
re: whc unesco
[edit]Hi! I already updated the maps. Please see the links on this article: Table of World Heritage Sites based on State Parties. However, couldn't do so for the map of cultural World Heritage Sites. Apparently, some other editor has overwritten the original file which I uploaded with one having a poorer resolution, hence, I could no longer edit the latest file. Thanks. Joey80 (talk) 02:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
DeLorean
[edit]Looks like Giugiaro designed the body, but not the other areas of the car (drivetrain, suspension, etc). Does that qualify as "designer" in the listing? If so, I'll keep him (and revert future changes) listed as designer. Thanks for your patient interest in the topic. --MartinezMD (talk) 21:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
I understood you well, and I think that will work fine. Ciao'.--MartinezMD (talk) 22:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Cut and paste moves are copyright violations, since you lost the edit history of the original article. Please use the Move Page option. Corvus cornixtalk 05:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
I can't do it now, because there was an article there. You'll have to ask an admin, they can override the history. Go to WP:RFPM and ask for an admin to do the move. Corvus cornixtalk 05:57, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
You should ask User:harej why his bot removed your request. I can't explain it. Corvus cornixtalk 17:43, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 26th European Film Awards shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --FAEP (talk) 17:43, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)