User talk:Pdrexler

Welcome!

Hello, Pdrexler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Tu s pm^{(C | @)} 20:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Art dreco

I'm posting on your page to make sure you see it.

Very short articles providing little or no context (e.g., "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great."). Limited content is not in itself a reason to delete if there is enough context to allow expansion.
— WP:CSD#A1

Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content. This does not include: poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, badly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes.
— WP:CSD#G1

Each of these would be reasons for a speedy deletion. I don't think the article quite meets either of those, but it's close, and I see no reason to keep it. Perhaps if you include Reliable Sources for the use of the term, and add some accurate history of the style, it might be kept. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 15:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 4 links indicate that the "Art Dreco Institute" may be real (or, at least arguably so); they do not indicate that anyone other than that institute and Paul Drexler use the term. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 15:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]