User talk:Petartag
Recent edit to Moretown, Vermont
[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Asdklf; (talk) 15:42, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Asdklf;: This user contacted OTRS because he didn't know why you reverted his edit, it would have been nice if you specified it in your edit summary or used a more specific notification template (not familiar with STiki, but I guess that should have been possible). FDMS 4 18:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- @FDMS4: Stiki doesn't allow for edit summaries and the templates provided specify that they should contact us if they have any more questions. I can manually change each template I use but the point of Stiki was to increase the efficiency with which edits could be analyzed. I suppose I could have used the "unencyclopedic details" template, but the problem with the edit was just that it was not in the correct tone and was unsourced, not that the detail it added was too specific. Asdklf; (talk) 19:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Asdklf;: Just curious – are you sure it doesn't? FDMS 4 19:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- @FDMS4: If you are referring to the box in the lower left I can honestly say I have never utilized it, since I didn't know its purpose, but it would make sense that would control edit summaries. That's cool to know and I will utilize it in the future if I feel a template is unspecific. Asdklf; (talk) 20:15, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Asdklf;: Just curious – are you sure it doesn't? FDMS 4 19:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- @FDMS4: Stiki doesn't allow for edit summaries and the templates provided specify that they should contact us if they have any more questions. I can manually change each template I use but the point of Stiki was to increase the efficiency with which edits could be analyzed. I suppose I could have used the "unencyclopedic details" template, but the problem with the edit was just that it was not in the correct tone and was unsourced, not that the detail it added was too specific. Asdklf; (talk) 19:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
moretown, vt
[edit]I stated that the way the town was named was "according to legend". As to it being the only Moretown in the US what am I supposed to cite - a Google search ? Do it yourself and you'll see. This rejection shows how self-important some people become.......petartag
- Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Here at Wikipedia we encourage editors to be bold in improving content, but not at the cost of sourcing! If you wish to make meaningful contributions to the encyclopedia, please read up on the relevant policies so you can double-check that your edits will be purposeful and relevant. Asdklf; (talk) 20:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)