User talk:Philbarber
User:Philbarber
[edit]I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article User:Philbarber, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:User:Philbarber|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- lucasbfr talk 10:35, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Your edits to Phil Barber
[edit]I have again reverted your edit to Phil Barber. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a venue for self promotion. Content must be written from a neutral viewpoint. Further, please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Here are some pages I think maybe worth your time reading: Wikipedia:Copyrights, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. 66.57.1.249 (talk) 01:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)