Jump to content

User talk:PhilipofBVM/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --PhilipofBVM (talk) 19:20, 4 August 2015 (UTC) If someone's photo was mistakenly used by myself some half year ago, I ask that the photo be "returned" to the owner, and it be taken down, if need be; however, to delete my account altogether, seems incorrect to me. Thanks. philipofBVM~~[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --PhilipofBVM (talk) 19:23, 4 August 2015 (UTC) If someone's photo was mistakenly used by myself some half year ago, I ask that the photo be "returned" to the owner, and it be taken down, if need be; however, to delete my account altogether, seems incorrect to me. Thanks. philipofBVMPhilipofBVM (talk)[reply]

I don't think anyone is proposing to delete your account. The problem was with the copyright-violating content in your sandbox, which has now been deleted. Maproom (talk) 21:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I see: I can explain all this to your satisfaction, but, must end it here, as I cannot go farther than this last point: philipofBVMPhilipofBVM (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC) Here is the point: yes, I did copy that information from cathinfo site; however, I am the one who penned that information, and it was backed up by some other Wikipedian. Ergo: this can never be considered copywrite infringement, to cut and paste one's own writing, word for word. Case closed. I might add here, that, for presenting the factual truth, in regards to the true Catholic baptism, of Saint Constantine the Great by Pope Sylvsester I, during his lifetime, and/or similiar factual reportings, such as this, and also, for example, that Marcel LeFebre was not a Catholic, but an apostate, for denying the "salvation dogma", I was banned from cathinfo site, and about 5 other sites, for telling the truth. Will also Wickedpedia also ban me? I can't go any further on all this. Go "seek, ask, and knock" and you shall find the true Catholic Church. Since you don't want me to give the site, most people can find it anyways by using key words. Thanks, again. Sincerely, philipofBVMPhilipofBVM (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Mr. Map room: you may think you are right in what you did, as regards that deletion; however, I later explained fully, and in detail on the same page under your comment, the truth of the matter; hence, you must un delete your deletion of my piece, as, I did explain then, I own the copywrite of my own words, as used on the cath info site; do you want more proof, as I can cut and paste the page in question, or at least give you the link? philipofBVMPhilipofBVM (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC) philipofBVMPhilipofBVM (talk) 00:24, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Map Room: nota bene!

[edit]
Mr. Map room: you may think you are right in what you did, as regards that deletion; however, I later explained fully, and in detail on the same page under your comment, the truth of the matter; hence, you must un delete your deletion of my piece, as, I did explain then, I own the copywrite of my own words, as used on the cath info site; do you want more proof, as I can cut and paste the page in question, or at least give you the link? philipofBVMPhilipofBVM (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhilipofBVM (talkcontribs)