User talk:PhysicsExplorer
PhysicsExplorer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was summarily blocked indefinitely for "personal attacks and harassment". I admit that I was annoyed and so I added some things to C.Fred's page. But I want to contribute constructively, and many people are blocked only for a day or two for doing far worse than I did. I feel that the full procedure wasn't followed and I wasn't given a proper chance.
Decline reason:
You were given ample warnings, and you did not stop. Full procedure was followed, as "full procedure" here means only having warned you of the consequences of your actions, and you continuing regardless. If you wish to continue editing constructively, please read our policies and come back. Places to start include WP:NPA, WP:OR, WP:V, among others. kurykh 10:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
PhysicsExplorer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The reason I said full procedure wasn't followed is that I received a final warning at 21:07, and was blocked at 21:10 [1] . I didn't make any edits whatsoever inbetween receiving the warning and being blocked [2] ...so what's the point of the warning? Be that as it may, as I said above, I admit that I acted rashly, and I want to return to edit constructively in accordance with policies. So I ask again for a review.
Decline reason:
I'd be happier supporting an unblock were it not for the images you've added to this talkpage subsequent to your block - both Giordano Bruno and Galileo were scientists and philosophers who, in their time, were penalized for holding then-heterodox beliefs. If this isn't tantamount to a statement that "I'm still right and I intend to show it despite what I see as censorship by the Establishment" I'm not sure what it is. You really need to work out why you were blocked - not because of the nature of the ideas you're trying to promulgate but because of your behaviour in so doing. Work out why the Quantum Aetherdynamics article was a) proposed for deletion and b) deleted (WP:V, WP:RS and the rest). Work out why leaving sarcastic passages on talkpages accusing someone of being 300 years old and supressing Galileo (while abusing the position as an admin) is wrong. Work out, if you are so keen on due process, why globally changing "delete" to "keep" on the article's AfD page is neither big, clever, nor productive. When you've worked these things out - particularly the part about the article not being deleted because of the theory itself (WP:FRINGE is a good page to read) you may be in a position to convince people that you intend editing productively and non-disruptively in the future. Tonywalton Talk 13:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.