User talk:Pjsg1867

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! S Philbrick (Talk) 01:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Uncivil edit summaries at LRTA 13000 class and at South African Class 34-500

Hi Pjsg1867. Do I really need to spell it out? Exercise some restraint. You will be subject to a block if you do that again.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to LRTA 13000 class, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, see the wonderful result of your tantrum? Because of your edit summaries' content, they had to be removed from public view; that, in turn, made it appear that you blanked content without leaving any edit summary – which in turn resulted in CommanderWaterford's revert. I have not looked at the merits of the underlying edits. If they are warranted, but are of a type requiring explanation in an edit summary, then here's your chance to act like an adult by using a cogent, decorous edit summary upon any return of the edits.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Fuhghettaboutit: The user argued that the proper spelling is "aging". Philippine English is hugely based on the American one since we were occupied for about half a century. However, British variant of words are also accepted; "ageing" is also correct. Second, the user removed the predecessor part on the infobox, which is a correct call. This has been brought back already. It's just his gross misuse of the edit summary that is unacceptable. HiwilmsTalk 20:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to MRTC 3000 class, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HiwilmsTalk 10:06, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]