User talk:Plover
- `Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
- Did gyre and gimble in the wabe...
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Plover, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
And please don't let Jason Gastrich get you down, he's an absolute netloon who is Being Taken Care Of. --Cyde Weys 04:08, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks re: Gastrich
[edit]Thanks for adding Gastrich's little love note to me to his official arbitration evidence – the arbitration process is a bit confusing for someone who's been active here for only a week or two. --Plover 01:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Although I think it was already there under a different heading, it's better to have it twice than not at all.
- As for the arbitration process, it's not too hard to follow. If you want to contribute evidence, just open a new heading at the bottom of the page (e.g. ==Evidence presented by Plover==) and add in your comments. To back them up, you need page differences, i.e. click History on the page you want to quote from, and choose the radio buttons before and after the comment you're presenting. But if it's too hard, you can just leave comments on Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Jason Gastrich. Have fun :) Stifle 11:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Request
[edit]Hi, Plover, I'm assigned to mediate the "Humanist Papacy" case and I'm new. Would appreciate comments from you, emailed to me or put on the mediation board for this issue, whatever, as to what you think is going on here. Rohnik has not responded. I see you offered to fashion a statement. It would be deeply appreciated. I don't think, however, that Couttis is going to get the apology statement he wants. That seems a bit odd.Chandler75 03:10, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Very kind of you to try to email me but no, alas, I didn't get it. Please re-send. Thanks.Chandler75 15:20, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Gotcha! Thanks a million. Now if I can only find a mediator for my poor case - you were extremely helpful with all the issues.Chandler75
Your edit in Category:If templates and Category:Boolean templates
[edit]I did revert those, because you were wrong there. →AzaToth 10:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC)