User talk:Politics608

Speedy deletion of Progressive Dane

A tag has been placed on Progressive Dane requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Avruch ^Talk 00:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Progressive Dane

Progressive Dane, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Progressive Dane satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Progressive Dane and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Progressive Dane during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. β^_command 16:47, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio's 5th congressional district

I liked your recent edit to Ohio's 5th congressional district. Can you insert a citation to the NRCC funding?—Markles 23:50, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]