User talk:Pontificate823

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Mike Leach[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Mike Leach (American football coach) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Furthermore, editors should not delete text that is supported by substantiating footnotes without explanation, and in this case your replacement text is not consistent with the NPOV policy and is also inaccurate in its description of some of the facts as set forth in the cite reliable sources. Wikipedia pages are edited by consensus; if you believe that any of this article should be changed, you are welcome to raise the issues at the talk page for the article.--Arxiloxos (talk) 15:58, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello. I was looking over my watchlist today and I noticed that you removed a significant portion of the "Firing" section of the Mike Leach article. I would like to invite you to please discuss these changes on the article's talk page. Thanks! —Voltin (T|C) 18:27, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

I noticed that you once again reverted an edit that was made the "Firing" section of the Mike Leach I implore you to please discuss these changes in the talk page of the article. Your edits suffer from Point of View problems that must be addressed to provide a well balanced article. Please see the article's talk page for more suggestions and to further discuss the article. If you continue your Edit Warring, sanctions can be placed on your account. Again I ask that you please discuss your edits on the talk page. —Voltin (T|C) 19:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mike Leach (American football coach). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. As reflected on the talk page of the article, multiple editors disagree with your edits. You have been repeatedly asked to come to the discuss your concerns, but you have not done so. At this point, your continuing reversions are against consensus and may be considered to be disruptive.--Arxiloxos (talk) 04:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Pontificate823, I assume you represent Mike Leach in some capacity, official (attorney, agent) or unofficial (fan, family). Nevertheless, you cannot simply edit the article to remove sourced information just because it could be construed as negative. Please present your arguments on the article's talk page before making further edits. Thank you. →Wordbuilder (talk) 22:52, 22 July 2010 (UTC)