User talk:Ps1on1c99

Reliable sources

Please note that blogs are not generally considered reliable sources for information on Wikipedia. For more information please take a look at WP:RS. Please feel free to ask if you have any questions about contributing to Wikipedia. --Leivick (talk) 22:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have ask you again not to insert links to Gamephoton. If major review sites are making the same observations than you need to quote them rather than a minor site like Gamephoton. I am beginning to get the impression that your only purpose here is to link to a particular site rather than improve the encyclopedia, if this continues it is likely that the account will be blocked (not by me). --Leivick (talk) 01:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 04:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Your recent addition to World of warcraft cataclysm has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 04:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of World of warcraft cataclysm

A tag has been placed on World of warcraft cataclysm, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 2help (message me) 04:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 04:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]