User talk:Pupluv

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Pupluv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Thank you especially for your edits to SUNY New Paltz. Bearian 17:27, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Null[edit]

I am responding to the request for a third opinion. I have moved the existing discussion to Talk:Clifton High School (New Jersey)#David Null so that any future questions regarding his inclusion/exclusion will have this discussion available. Mdbrownmsw 14:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful hint[edit]

Before deleting unsourced content from articles, you should first make a good faith effort to find a source for the material, and then place a tag (for example {{Fact|date=October 2007}} to request a source for encyclopedic content. Going on a rampage and deleting content is considered bad form. Alansohn 04:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to say the same thing. It's good to be bold when adding material, but cautious when deleting it. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"If you wish to change an existing procedure or guideline...
  • do set up a discussion page and try to establish consensus
  • don't push the existing rule to its limits in an attempt to prove it wrong, or nominate the existing rule for deletion."
WP:POINT
Mdbrownmsw 06:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ronald F. Maxwell[edit]

I'm sorry to bother you while you are on your path of vengeance, but a reminder that WP:BIO states that "Notability criteria is also needed for a person to be included in a list or general article; however, this criteria is less stringent." It is becoming clearer and clearer that your recent edits to this article are not a good faith effort to improve the article, but are in fact an effort to excise a pound of flesh for the failure to insert David Null. I strongly suggest that you review WP:POINT before you continue with any more disruption. Alansohn 12:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    • Even you can't possibly believe the crap you're spewing. Your abuse -- which meets the textbook definition of WP:POINT disruption -- has been taken to the grievance process. A well-deserved block should help you focus on productively building an encyclopedia, not childish tit-for-tat revenge based on blatant disregard for Wikipedia policy. Alansohn 20:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

quick note[edit]

While you can cite Villaraigosa's troubles with the bar exam, please be careful not to imply that Gilbert Cedillo "must not have passed the bar" because he is not a member of the Cal Bar. There are a number of people who graduate from law school but decide not to take the bar for various reasons. If we have a cite that he failed the bar, then its fine to add it. --Bobak 19:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a minor note: Please remember to make comments on a user's talk page (discussion tab), not the user page itself --you can always hit the "+" button on the top of the talk page (next to edit) in order to create a new discussion heading. I didn't mind, I simply moved the comment to my talk page, but some user pages have elaborate formatting and a user might mistake your comment for vandalism. All the best and happy editing. --Bobak 22:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You claim to have started an RfC at Talk:Ronald F. Maxwell, but you haven't said what you want to discuss. Corvus cornix 20:46, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I apologize. I thought I used the template correctly. I have attempted to correct the error. Please check.Pupluv 21:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The first step should have been to put a {{refimprove}} tag on the article. Corvus cornix 21:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]