Jump to content

User talk:PutItOnAMap: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 43: Line 43:
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank's for help! [[User:Sûriyeya|Sûriyeya]] ([[User talk:Sûriyeya|talk]]) 12:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank's for help! [[User:Sûriyeya|Sûriyeya]] ([[User talk:Sûriyeya|talk]]) 12:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
|}
|}

== Syrian Civil War and ISIL general sanctions ==


{{Ivmbox
|'''''Please read this notification carefully,''' it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

A [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive253#Request to amend sanctions on Syrian civil war articles|community decision]] has authorised the use of [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|general sanctions]] for pages related to the [[Syrian Civil War]] and the [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant]]. The details of these sanctions are described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant|here]]. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a '''one [[Help:Reverting|revert]] per twenty-four hours [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|restriction]]''', as described [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant#1RR|here]].

[[Wikipedia:General sanctions|General sanctions]] is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means [[WP:INVOLVED|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behaviour]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Syrian Civil War and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant#Log of notifications|here]]. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
| Commons-emblem-notice.svg
| icon size = 50px}} <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 11:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:25, 2 February 2016

Semicircles

SOHR just said that clashes was during an ISISI attack carried out by the on the area of these oil fields (it was short attack on the checkpoints in these areas and nothing more) we put a semicircles when one of side try to storm or siege some objects. We put red semicircle near near Al Thayyem processing plant in Deir ez Zor because reliable source said that the SAA captured the northen oil wells in the Al Thayyem oil fiedls. Here source said that the SAA finally entered Al-Thayyem Oil Fields and seizing unused wells that are situated at its northern perimeter.here Also we put semicercle when at during an offensive on of the sides in this conflict trying stormed take town, village oil/gas fields or molitary objects as we do this in Aleppo and Homs provinces where SAA trying take some villages or on Homs wher SAA try capture the town of Qaryatayn and long time clashes on the rerimetr of this town. Also we put semicircle when some area besieged as it is in northen part of Homs province when some rebels-held the towns and villages isolated from their main territories which the under their control. In Homs rebels besieged in pocket in northen part when now SAA conducting offensive. We also put semicircles if clashes continued long time on perimeter of the towns,villages and some other points (Army bases or Industrial obgects). But not put if it was jist short attack. Sûriyeya (talk) 09:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also we put circle or semicircle when some point totally besieged as the towns Nubl and Zahra in Aleppo because these towns in siege of the rebels from all sides. Sûriyeya (talk) 09:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the guide, I thought you just put a semicircle around an area when it was coming under fire from one side rather than if it was totally besieged. I'll keep that in mind for when I'm making future edits to the amp. PutItOnAMap (talk) 10:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Az Zarah

You made mistake. Source said about clashes Az Zarah in Hama and I marked this village as contested.here But you made mistake and marked as contested the village al-Zaraa in Aleppo province. Please self-revert this.here Sûriyeya (talk) 12:36, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I will help you and myself doit. Sûriyeya (talk) 13:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing this error. I mixed up the names because they sounded similar and just navigated to 'Zaraa' without actually checking what provine it was in when I edited the map. PutItOnAMap (talk) 13:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ISIS in Qalamoun

Source said about battle between SAA and ISIS in East Qalamoun.here SOHR said that the ISIS shelled this base here in east Qalamoun. And SAA start battle against ISIS in East Qalamoun. So we need put black icon in this area.here But you marked ISIS presence in west Qalamoun. Correct the your mistake. Khalifa trooper (talk) 11:35, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will do that. PutItOnAMap (talk) 11:36, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Najjar Industrial District

Sheikh Najjar Industrial District long time SAA-held. Source only said that SAA advance west toward Sheikh Najjar Industrial District and Aleppo Infantry Academy and that only latter(Academy)ISIS-held.(SAA and allies are now pushing west toward the Sheikh Najjar Industrial District and the Aleppo Infantry Academy and if the latter(Aleppo Infantry Academy) is captured, they will have a gateway to northern Aleppo from the provincial capital.) source Sûriyeya (talk) 13:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Latakia

I ask you to take part in the discussion.here Sûriyeya (talk) 12:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For now Kabbani located on map. Why you add another town Kabbani? Thih town located here Kabanah but you add this town in the wrong place. So need fix map. Sûriyeya (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Here this town on map Kabanah but you put the town once again on the map but in the wrong place. But not worry I correct this your mistake.here Sûriyeya (talk) 15:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jarajeer

Here source said that the SAA captured the villages of Fawqani, Jabal Al-Tarou, Al-‘Arid Al-Hamra, Kurt Al-Tahtani, and Katf Al-Khani.here But Jabal Al-Tarou it is a mount Tarou not village. Also source said SAA captured the villages of Raweesat Sheikhou and Katf Al-Salat.here But Raweesat Sheikhou it is a hilltop not a village. And again source said SAA and their allies advanced to the villages of Al-Musharifa Fawqa, Al-Musharifa Al-Tahta, Raweesat Al-Maslaanah, and Katf Al-‘Alaanah.here Raweesat Al-Maslaanah it is a hilltop. And Jaroud Jarajeer it is a not village Jarajeer it is a open highlands near the village on the border with Lebanon. Sûriyeya (talk) 11:04, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank's that you mark a Production Facility as ISIS-held becasue I'm forgot do this when do edit earlier.here I only edit coordintes. Sûriyeya (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Jaroud Jarajeer is still contested between primarily Nusra (some rebels, too) and IS, and there is an illegal border crossing there. I'll mark it as contested until one side captures it, at which point I'll change it to a presence icon marked 'Jaroud Jarajeer'. PutItOnAMap (talk) 13:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea buddy! Sûriyeya (talk) 13:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thank's for help! Sûriyeya (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Syrian Civil War and ISIL general sanctions

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 11:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]