This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Editors are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction when reverting logged-in users on all pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. When in doubt, assume it is related, and don't revert.
Please see here for more information. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked or otherwise sanctioned without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
1- A reliable source for that specific edit should be provided.
a) A well-known source that has a reputation for neutral (not biased) territorial control coverage, can be used (is deemed reliable) for all edits.
b) A well-known source that does not have a reputation for neutral (not biased) territorial control coverage, can be used (is deemed reliable) only for edits that are unfavorable to the side it prefers (favorable to the side it opposes).
c) A source that is not well-known (or that has proven inaccurate for all edits) cannot be used (is deemed unreliable) for any edit. This includes all maps (see item 2- next).
2- Copying from maps is strictly prohibited. Maps from mainstream media are approximate and therefore unreliable for any edit. Maps from amateur sources are below the standards of Wikipedia for any edit. They violate WP:RS and WP:CIRCULAR.
WP:RS: “Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book, and also claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published media, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs, Internet forum postings, and tweets, are largely not acceptable as sources.” Source: Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published_sources
WP:CIRCULAR: “Do not use websites that mirror Wikipedia content or publications that rely on material from Wikipedia as sources.”
3- WP:POV pushing and intentional misinterpretation of sources will not be tolerated. If you are not sure about what the source is saying (or its reliability), post it on the talk page first so that it would be discussed.
This map has gotten very sloppy in the past 2 weeks. The dots representing towns are in many cases no longer circular, and I now see some villages in northern Raqqa demarcated as '?' and 'clashes near [other village's name].' This really isn't an acceptable standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 22.214.171.124 (talk) 16:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
As I said, we have to remove the Aleppo map — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk) 02:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
I don't even know why the entire area is government held in the first place, sure, there was an agreement but rebels never left the Valley, and now that the ceasefire is broken the villages should be back to rebel held, whit the exception of Basimah, Ain al-Fijah and Ayn al Khadra, wiche were captured by SAA this week. Valewonca (talk) 23:32, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Also, i'm wondering why Bassima was removed. It wasn't on the map for the whole time the Syrian army and terrorists were fighting over it, it was briefly added to the map after the Syrian army captured it, then it was removed from the map again. That seems to happen a lot with towns in the Damascus area. I've seen it many times with East Ghouta. It can make it hard to find out what's happening where. I keep having to go to Google to find the location of towns that don't exist on this map, where important battles are happening. Seems to defeat the purpose of the map. Kawada Kira (talk) 00:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)