User talk:Qewel/Privacy on dating apps

Current Bibliography

Alterovitz, Sheyna S. and Gerald A. Mendelsohn. 2009. "Partner Preferences Across the Life Span: Online Dating by Older Adults." Psychology and Aging 24(2):513-517

Bartos, Sebastian E., Voon C. Phua and Erin Avery. 2009. "Differences in Romanian Men's Online Personals by Sexualities." Journal of Men's Studies 17(2):145-154

Bubas, Goran, Tihomir Orehovacki, and Mario Konecki. 2008. “Factors and Predictors of Online Security and Privacy Behavior.” Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences 32(2):79-98.

Chen, Wenhong & Kye-Hyoung Lee. 2013. “Sharing, liking, commenting, and distressed? The pathway between facebook interaction and psychological distress.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16(10):728-733.

Crosier, Benjamin S., Gregory D. Webster and Haley M. Dillon. 2012. "Wired to Connect: Evolutionary Psychology and Social Networks." Review of General Psychology 16(2):230-239

Dienlin, Tobias, and Sabine Trepte. 2015. “Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors.” European Journal Of Social Psychology 45(3):285-297.

DiLillo, David and Emily B. Gale. 2011. "To Google Or Not to Google: Graduate Students' use of the Internet to Access Personal Information about Clients."Training and Education in Professional Psychology 5(3):160-166

Gudelunas, David. 2012. "There's an App for that: The Uses and Gratifications of Online Social Networks for Gay Men." Sexuality & Culture 16(4):347-365

Jain, Anuja, Elizabeth M. Petty, Reda M. Jaber, Sean Tackett, Joel Purkiss, James Fitzgerald, & Casey White. 2014. “What is appropriate to post on social media? Ratings from students, faculty members and the public.” Medical Education 48(2):157-169.

Kolmes, Keely. 2012. "Social Media in the Future of Professional Psychology."Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 43(6):606-612

Labrague, Leonardo J. 2014. “Facebook use and adolescents' emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress.” Health Science Journal 8(1):80-89.

Mendelsohn, Gerald A., Lindsay Shaw Taylor, Andrew T. Fiore and Coye Cheshire. 2014. "Black/White Dating Online: Interracial Courtship in the 21st Century."Psychology of Popular Media Culture 3(1):2-18

Menkin, Josephine A., Theodore F. Robles, Joshua F. Wiley and Gian C. Gonzaga. 2015. "Online Dating Across the Life Span: Users’ Relationship Goals."Psychology and Aging 30(4):987-993

Moore, Shelley C.,R.N.M.S.N. 2012. "Digital Footprints on the Internet."International Journal of Childbirth Education 27(3):86-91

Prentice, Jennifer L. and Keith S. Dobson. 2014. "A Review of the Risks and Benefits Associated with Mobile Phone Applications for Psychological Interventions." Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne 55(4):282-290

Regan, Priscilla M. 1993. "Ideas Or Interests: Privacy in Electronic Communications." Policy Studies Journal 21(3):450

Strano, Michele M. and Jill Wattai Queen. 2012. "Covering Your Face on Facebook: Suppression as Identity Management." Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications 24(4):166-180

Tsunokai, Glenn T., Augustine J. Kposowa and Michele A. Adams. 2009. "Racial Preferences in Internet Dating: A Comparison of Four Birth Cohorts."Western Journal of Black Studies 33(1):1-15

Varnali, Kaan, and Aysegul Toker. 2015. “Self-Disclosure on Social Networking Sites.” Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal 43(1):1-13.

Zurbriggen, Eileen L., Ella Ben Hagai and Gabrielle Leon. 2016. "Negotiating Privacy and Intimacy on Social Media: Review and Recommendations."Translational Issues in Psychological Science 2(3):248-260

Qewel (talk) 05:37, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review by MooCow1

In your lead section, you should describe privacy on dating apps in more detail.

What "personal information" is being presented on these apps?
How do these apps (and the privacy maintained on them) differ from traditional dating websites?
More examples of the distinction between dating sites and regular social media sites in regard to how much private information is displayed.

May also want to add more about what the rest of the article will be about once you've decided on your subtopics.

"History" section Wording is a little clunky. Should smooth this out as you continue to work on it. Need to be more specific - "The aims of these online dating services established the same model that dating applications on mobile devices would implement themselves"

What is the aim of these sites?
What model did dating apps take from dating sites?
May be able to tie in the reason for having so much personal information on these sites.

Your potential subtopics look promising. Something you may consider discussing is people's lack of knowledge regarding the vulnerability of the information they put on dating apps, which might contribute to their willingness to put so much on them.

Overall, it looks like you have a good idea of where you want to go with the article. Just make sure you explain everything you're talking about and be specific when doing so. Also, don't forget to cite everything as you move forward.

MooCow1 (talk) 18:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review by Xkwhvzde

Your article about privacy on dating apps could benefit from mention of more dating apps in your page, though I understand that this is primarily because there are a lack of sources (we discussed this in lab this week). Mentioning data breaches that have occurred on dating websites like Ashley Madison could be particularly helpful to explaining how much or little someone has over their privacy. Your last sentence of your lead is not as neutral as it could be. Making statements like “this makes it clear” is a little opinionated, unless there are citations that could actually verify this. Your outline has a variety of subjects that I think would make your page not orphaned. Your outline includes a section of “background on privacy” but I think the background of privacy could be something that’s mentioned in your lead. I think also seeing a bibliography on your page would be beneficial to people looking at your sandbox because it could give us a small idea of what kind of articles you’re working with.

Peer Review by Xkwhvzde

Xkwhvzde (talk) 18:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)I think you can benefit from expanding more on your sections. There are some sections, such as the "Impression Management" and "Catfishing" one that I feel like you can benefit from. Your sections on online dating (or potential contributions) I think would benefit most from more information about how exactly that ties in to someone's privacy, because its not so clear. Including more information about dating websites and their user agreements would ultimately help the article expand as well. Either way, good job on the work that you have done so far. Xkwhvzde (talk) 18:14, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]