User talk:Rachael.l.williams

Welcome!

Hello, Rachael.l.williams, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Ruby Reds, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EuroPride (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ruby Reds

The article Ruby Reds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EuroPride (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Syren Sexton

The article Syren Sexton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO, no indication the subject can satisfy the GNG or any other specialized guideline. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. Claimed awards, supposedly representing website polls, are given by product suppliers to their own performers and therefore do not demonstrate notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:20, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Syren Sexton

Blatant IDON'TLIKEIT prod at Syren Sexton (see above). Your input might be required, one way or the other. --82.41.20.82 (talk) 00:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now AfD'd as PROD nominator's teddy comes hurtling out of the pram. Your input may be required one way or the other. --82.41.20.82 (talk) 16:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tanya Tate

The article Tanya Tate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO, only AVN nom contributes to notability; fails the GNG. virtually all GNews hits are PR/presskit pieces or relate to different people with same name

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kerry Louise for deletion

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kerry Louise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerry Louise (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]