User talk:Raevaen

Science Frontiers

The problem is that Science-Frontiers is original analysis and synthesis from reliable sources. Using Physics Today and American Scientist articles directly is not only fine, it's commendable. But we should refer to those works directly and NOT to Corliss's personal website which has obvious POV issues given his particular spin on "anomalistics". ScienceApologist (talk) 17:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)