User talk:Raevel

Have a slightly belated

Welcome!

Hello Raevel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Although, after looking at your contribs, you won't need the links provided.... :) Lectonar 12:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Whitney Hagas Matsumoto[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Whitney Hagas Matsumoto, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Whitney Hagas Matsumoto is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Whitney Hagas Matsumoto, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Instant Remedy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Instant Remedy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instant Remedy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 05:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]